Click HERE for Senator McConnell’s Coronavirus Response Portal

Recent Press Releases

 
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) announced Thursday that his legislation to renew sanctions against the Burmese government has passed the Senate and is now on its way to the President’s desk for his signature.  The Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act was cosponsored by Senators McConnell and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA).  McConnell made the following statement regarding passage of the legislation:
 
“As in years past, this resolution will extend import sanctions for another year against Burmese goods in order to maintain economic pressure on the ruling State Peace and Development Council (SPDC).  It also continues the Tom Lantos Block Burmese JADE Act, which was enacted last year and further increased sanctions against the junta.
 
“In some circles the value of sanctions has been questioned and, at some point, greater engagement with the regime may be in order.  However, by passing this measure, Congress has clearly concluded that such a change in policy would be premature, and for good reason.  The very fact that Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi has been put on trial by the regime for trumped-up charges reflects how essential it is to continue these measures against the SPDC.  To do otherwise would implicitly condone the junta’s actions in trying her.  It also would turn a blind eye to the regime having imprisoned Suu Kyi for 13 of the past 20 years, to say nothing of the scores of less well-known political prisoners who currently languish in Burmese prisons. 
 
“UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon’s recent trip to Burma, I think, demonstrates yet again the true nature of this regime.  During his visit, he was denied access to Suu Kyi and apparently received no concessions from the junta.  This reflects that it is the SPDC that does not want to engage meaningfully with the international community, not the other way around.  Therefore, my colleagues and I believe that sanctions against the junta should remain in place until such time as the regime truly commits itself to a course of democratization and reconciliation. 
 
“Nor should anyone be fooled by the junta’s transparent efforts to legitimize its rule through the scheduled 2010 elections.  By excluding Suu Kyi from participating in the elections and by including provisions that would permanently entrench military rule, the new Burmese charter is no more legitimate than the regime that sponsored it.  More than halfway through 2009, it is hard to see how next year’s elections in Burma are redeemable.
 
“Congress’s posture toward the Burmese regime is not just borne out of humanitarian concerns; it also involves important national security considerations.  Just this week, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton publicly raised questions about alleged military links between the junta and North Korea.  The details of the Burmese-North Korean relationship are murky but, according to the Washington Post, concern has been raised among U.S. officials about a possible budding nuclear relationship between the two autocracies.      
 
“Finally, I note that this resolution has brought together 66 members of this chamber as cosponsors, more cosponsors than any previous year.  This showing reflects yet again the genuine bipartisan support for the people of Burma and opposition to the junta’s rule.  In this effort, I was pleased to work closely again with my friend Senator Dianne Feinstein, who has long been a vigorous advocate for the Burmese people.  Senators McCain and Durbin have also been stalwarts in their support for freedom in Burma, and they once again were at the vanguard of this legislative undertaking.”
 
###
 
‘The President was right. The proposals we’ve seen aren’t where they need to be. Not even close. But that doesn’t mean reform isn’t possible, that reform isn’t coming, or that anyone doesn’t want reform’

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor Wednesday regarding the importance of getting it right on health care reform:

“Yesterday, the President, to his credit, acknowledged what the American people have been telling us for weeks: that the Democratic health care proposals currently making their way through Congress aren’t where they need to be. I couldn’t agree with him more.

“All of us recognize the need for reform. That’s not in question. And that’s why day after day, I have come to the floor of the Senate and proposed concrete, common-sense reforms that all of us can agree on, reforms that would increase access, decrease costs, and guarantee that no one in this country would be forced to give up the care they currently have.

“As I’ve said repeatedly, we should reform malpractice laws; encourage wellness and prevention programs that encourage healthier lifestyles like quitting smoking and fighting obesity; promote more competition in the private insurance market; and address the needs of small businesses in a way that doesn’t kill jobs in the middle of a recession.

“Unfortunately, the administration seems bent on its own proposal for a government-driven plan that costs trillions of dollars and asks small businesses and seniors to pay for it.

“Once this plan is implemented, the American people could be left with a system that none of them would recognize and that most of them would regret — a system in which health care is denied, delayed, and rationed, a system which delivers worse care than Americans currently receive at an even higher cost. Americans want reform. But they don’t want this. And they don’t want either of the two proposals we’ve seen so far.

“Both proposals could lead to a government takeover of health care, increase long-term health care costs, and cost trillions of dollars — on the backs of seniors, small businesses, and by adding hundreds of billions of dollars to the already-staggering national debt.

“The President has said that both of these bills need work. And in my view, Democrats in Congress should listen to the President and come up with something Americans really want.

“This may take time. But Americans would rather that we get these reforms right than just get them written. When it comes to health care, Americans are sending a clear message: slow down and get it right. It’s a message many of us have been delivering for weeks, and it’s a message that one of the Senate’s top Democrats in the health care debate seemed to echo yesterday when he said that the critical test isn’t whether we meet a certain deadline but whether we get this reform right, whether it stands the test of history.

“We know Americans reject an artificial deadline on closing Guantanamo without a plan on what to do to keep us safe from the detainees who are housed there. And they regret accepting a rushed and artificial deadline on the Stimulus. Health care is simply too important to rush — just to meet a date someone picked out of the air.

“The arguments we’ve heard in favor of rushing just don’t square with reality.

“The administration and some in Congress say that we have to pass these bills right away because rising health care costs are an imminent threat to the economy. Yet the Democrat plans we’ve seen so far would make the problem worse. According to the independent Congressional Budget Office, the Democrat proposals would very likely increase overall health care spending, not reduce it. There goes that argument.

“Others say we need to pass these bills right away because people can’t live under the current system a day longer. Yet many of the proposals we’ve seen wouldn’t even go into effect for at least another four years. There goes that argument.

“Some say that under the proposals we’ve seen Americans won’t lose the coverage they have. Yet independent studies show that millions would be pushed off plans they currently have and like. There goes that argument too.

“The only possible explanation for passing a bill in two weeks that could hand over one sixth of the U.S. economy to the government is that the longer this plan sits out in the open, the more Americans oppose it. Already, Americans are shocked at the idea of funding a government takeover of health care on the backs of seniors through cuts to Medicare or through taxes on small businesses in the middle of a recession. They’re shocked to hear that the final proposal could force taxpayers to fund abortions. They have serious concerns about adding to the national debt. And they’re worried about the prospect of being forced off the plans they currently have. These concerns are serious. They should be taken seriously — not brushed aside in the service of some artificial deadline.

“No one in Washington wants to block health care reform. But many of us do want to take the time that’s needed to deliver the kinds of reform that Americans actually want — not a so-called reform that leads to a government takeover of health care that leaves people paying more for worse care than they currently have.

“The President was right. The proposals we’ve seen aren’t where they need to be. Not even close. But that doesn’t mean reform isn’t possible, that reform isn’t coming, or that anyone doesn’t want reform. What it does mean is that we need to take the time to get the health care reforms the American people really want. This is what they expect. And we should do no less.”

###


WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell and Congressman John Yarmuth joined together Wednesday to introduce bills in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives to name the current and future VA hospital in Louisville the “Robley Rex Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.”

The idea of naming the hospital after Rex was first brought to the attention of Senator McConnell and Congressman Yarmuth by Kentucky Veterans. Senator McConnell and Congressman Yarmuth have since heard from numerous Kentucky veterans who support the proposal, including members of the Kentucky Department of Veterans of Foreign Wars who endorsed it after its recent state convention.

“I can't think of a more appropriate person after whom to name the facility than Robley Rex,” Senator McConnell said. “Robley Rex was not only one of the Bluegrass State’s best known veterans, he was also its preeminent volunteer on behalf of veterans. Decades after his own active service ended, he continued to serve his fellow soldiers by volunteering at the Louisville VA Medical Center, right up until the last years of his life.”

“Robley Rex dedicated so much of his life as a tireless ally and advocate for his fellow veterans. He was a true Louisville institution,” said Congressman Yarmuth. “It is very fitting that the facility which will serve our veterans for decades to come will bear Robley Rex’s name and honor his commitment of service to the men and women of the armed forces.”

Rex served his nation during the period immediately following World War I and devoted over 14,000 hours of his time volunteering to help fellow veterans. Rex passed away on April 28, 2009, a few days shy of his 108th birthday. He was Kentucky’s last World War I-era veteran.

NOTE: Last year, the VA Secretary agreed to spend $75 million for the planning and design needed to build a new Louisville VA hospital, which was the maximum the VA could obligate for the project in FY '09. The site selection process for the new hospital is currently underway.

###