Click HERE for Senator McConnell’s Coronavirus Response Portal

Recent Press Releases

‘Unlike some of our previous recent debates, broad bipartisan agreement now exists in support of the proposition that the efforts of our servicemen and women should be funded and supported’

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following statement Thursday regarding the emergency funding for combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Supplemental Appropriations Act passed in the Senate with a vote of 91-5: “As the Senate takes up legislation today on emergency funding for combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, U.S. forces overseas can be reassured by this: unlike some of our previous recent debates, broad bipartisan agreement now exists in support of the proposition that the efforts of our servicemen and women should be funded and supported.

“The supplemental agreement we’re considering today includes nearly $80 billion for the Defense Department. This funding will allow General Odierno and our uniformed men and women in Iraq to preserve the security gains they achieved during the surge, continue the transition to greater Iraqi control and capability, and deny refuge to Al Qaeda in Iraq.

“These funds will also be used to support a surge of forces in Afghanistan. And to those of us who ignored previous calls for arbitrary withdrawal dates in Iraq, it’s particularly encouraging to see that President Obama has accepted the recommendations of General Petraeus for sending additional forces into Afghanistan. Success there isn’t assured. Looking ahead, we can expect continued challenges associated with the upcoming Afghan national elections, the need to continue the expansion of the Afghan National Army and Police, and the need to combat corruption within the Afghan ministries. But the President was right to direct a surge of forces, appoint a new commander, and refocus our efforts on a broad counterinsurgency strategy to combat the Taliban.

“Republicans support this surge and understand that broad security gains in Afghanistan cannot be achieved without the sustained improvement of the Afghanistan National Army and police forces. But this strategy will also require a sustained effort on the part of the government, the people, and the military forces of Pakistan to deny the Taliban, Al Qaeda, and associated groups sanctuary in the Tribal Areas of Pakistan.

“Just two months ago, the situation in Pakistan appeared to be so dire that the Secretary of State openly voiced concern that ‘the Pakistani government is basically abdicating to the Taliban and to extremists.’ Since that time, the Pakistani military has moved in force into the Swat Valley to combat this threat. Our commitment to helping Pakistan prevail in this fight, which must be conducted as a counterinsurgency if it is to succeed, must be sustained. Fortunately, the Supplemental contains funds to allow it.

“Another important issue that must be addressed is the effort by some to force the release of photos depicting the alleged mistreatment or mistreatment of detainees in Iraq and Afghanistan. I’m afraid that those encouraging the release of these photos fail to appreciate the potential consequences of such a release. The United States has painfully come to learn that Al Qaeda and the Taliban are sophisticated communicators who exploit the airwaves and the internet. That’s why the concerns expressed by our military commanders over the release of additional photos depicting the alleged mistreatment of detainees were of equal concern to our allies and friends. Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and other countries deal each day with the threat of militant radicals. They know how these images can be exploited by terrorist groups, and the bitter consequences that could follow. Senators Lieberman, Graham, and McCain should be commended for making these concerns their own — and carrying them to the American people.

“Senator Graham noted on the floor yesterday that he believes the President shares the Senate’s concerns about the potential dangers of releasing these photos. Last evening we passed legislation that would prevent any additional strategic harm from the release of photographs like these. Now the House must act.

“Although Republicans support the President’s Supplemental for our operations and overall objectives in Iraq and Afghanistan, a bipartisan majority disagree with the President in one important respect — and that’s the administration’s request for $80 million from Congress for the purpose of closing the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay before the administration even has a place to put the detainees who are housed there, any plan for military commissions, or any articulated plan for indefinite detention or for transferring detainees in a manner that ensures the safety of the American people.

“During January of this year, by executive order, the President established an arbitrary date for closing the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay. In April, the administration submitted its funding request to close Guantanamo as part of this supplemental bill, and the Senate voted 90-6 against including that funding. But it is worth reminding the Senate that the defense budget request for fiscal year 2010 includes a similar funding request, so the Senate will consider this matter again in the near future.

“Bipartisan majorities of both houses and the American people oppose closing Guantanamo without a plan, and several important questions remain unanswered: why was it necessary to bring detainees to the United States for prosecution, rather than using the courtroom at Guantanamo? If these terrorists are found to be not guilty by a civilian court, will they be returned to detention or released? What threat assessments were conducted prior to the recent transfers of detainees to Iraq, Chad, and Saudi Arabia?

“The task force established by the President to review the closure of Guantanamo is scheduled to conclude its work in July, so Congress may learn of the administration’s plans later this year. But this conference report requires the President to report to the Congress concerning the threat any further detainees who are released or transferred pose to the American people and our service members overseas. This will be of increasing importance as the Task Force decides the fate of detainees from Yemen.

“As I said, Republicans supported the President when he reconsidered his plan to withdraw forces from Iraq. It’s our hope that he will show similar openness when it comes to his arbitrary deadline for closing Guantanamo. The Senate has spoken clearly on this issue repeatedly. It’s our hope that the administration heeds the wishes of the American people as expressed through their elected representatives when it comes to releasing and transferring dangerous terrorists.

“As the arbitrary closure date approaches, we will continue to press this issue forward.

“The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have placed a great strain on our combat forces, the weapons and equipment that they need to succeed and on the training base that helps to keep the force ready. This bill continues the Senate’s support for this force, and for the dangerous missions that they undertake on our behalf, and therefore it deserves our support. It is not perfect, but it meets the needs of our commanders in the field. America remains a nation at war. Our forces fighting these wars deserve our support, and the funding in this bill.”

###
‘The administration admits it made a mistake on its predictions about the stimulus. We shouldn’t make the same mistake again when it comes to health’

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor Wednesday regarding the importance of getting it right on health care reform:

“Earlier this year, the new administration proposed and Democrats in Congress approved an economic stimulus bill that was meant to lift the economy at a time of massive job losses and widespread economic hardship.

“Not only was the bill enormously complex, it was also one of the costliest pieces of legislation ever proposed.

“And yet those who put it together insisted that it be rushed to a vote.

“Their reason: the economic downturn was just too dire to wait. ‘Trust us,’ they said. ‘It’s responsible; it’s needed; and it will work.’

“And so this incredibly complex, enormously expensive bill, which was introduced on January 26th — was passed less than three weeks later — just 24 hours — 24 hours — after all of its details had been disclosed to the public for review.

“At the time, I argued that spending this much borrowed money in the middle of a recession on a bill that had been rushed to the floor was extremely irresponsible. At a time when millions were struggling just to make ends meet, Washington had no business borrowing hundreds of billions of dollars to pay for government golf carts and ATV trails in the name of economic stimulus. This week, Senator Coburn has catalogued some of the other outrages that are contained in this bill.

“Here are just a few:

“The town of Union, New York, received a $578,000 grant that it didn’t request for a homelessness problem it claims it does not have.

“Florida is planning to spend $3.4 million in stimulus money to build a 13 foot turtle tunnel at Lake Jackson. That’s more than $250,000 per foot.

“And — this one takes the cake — in North Carolina, $40,234 in federal stimulus money will pay for the salary of someone whose job is to lobby … for more stimulus funds … $40,234 just to pay someone to lobby for more stimulus money.

“This would be comical if it weren’t so maddening, and if these projects hadn’t been sold to the American people as the answer to our economic problems, and if the administration hadn’t assured us that it would make sure every cent of this money was spent efficiently and without waste.

“But that was then.

“The administration had promised since January that it would keep an eye on how precious tax dollars were spent. But just months after the stimulus was signed into law it was already admitting that funds would be wasted and that people were being scammed.

“In January and February, administration economists took to the talk shows promising that the Stimulus would create three million to four millions jobs. They said that if we passed the stimulus, the unemployment rate would now be about eight percent.

“But just a few months later, with job losses continuing to mount, the administration admits that their earlier predictions were a guess — and that they guessed wrong.

“Today, the unemployment rate stands at 9.4 percent, and just yesterday the administration said it expects unemployment to climb even higher.

“A trillion dollars that they said was absolutely necessary to jumpstart the economy, and which was put on a fast-track by an eager to please Democratic-led Congress, is now being called a bad guess by the very people who proposed it. And now they’re asking us to do it again.

“Only this time it’s even more than $1 trillion, and the consequences could be far worse. The early estimates we’re getting for the health care proposal we’ve seen is that just a portion of it will spend $1.3 trillion.

“This figure, staggering in itself, doesn’t even account for the money that would be needed to pay for expanding Medicaid and creating a new government-run plan.

“And no one can tell us where any of this money will come from.

“Yet, just like the stimulus, we’re being told in the most urgent tones that this government takeover of health care is absolutely necessary, and that we have to approve it as soon as possible — without review, without knowing the full cost, and without knowing how it will affect people's lives.

“Once again, it’s rush and spend, and rush and spend — and a tidal wave of debt.

“Everyone in America knows that health care reform is needed in this country. But they want us to do it right — they don’t want a blind rush to spend trillions of dollars in the hope the administration gets it right.

“During the debate over the stimulus, we were told that we had to pass it right away, with just 24 hours review — or $42 billion an hour, for the sake of the economy.

“Now we’re being told we need to approve a particular set of health care reforms …. for the sake of the economy. But we have no bill. We have no idea of its total cost. And yet it’s rush, rush, rush.

“We’ve heard all this before. We’ve made this mistake already. Americans won’t be rushed into another one.

“Americans want health care reform. But they want the right reform — not a government takeover disguised as a reform that takes away the care they have, replaces it with something worse, and costs untold trillions that they and their grandchildren will have to pay for through higher taxes and even more debt.

“The administration admits it made a mistake on its predictions about the stimulus. We shouldn’t make the same mistake again when it comes to health care.”

###

‘The bottom line is this: Under the illusion of reform, Americans will be asked to give up the care they like for something worse, and then they’ll be taxed to the hilt to pay for it’

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor Tuesday regarding the importance of getting it right on health care reform:

“The health care system in this country is in urgent need of reform. People are frustrated with the soaring cost of care, and they’re frustrated that so many of their fellow Americans lack the coverage that they need and that they should be able to expect in a nation as prosperous as ours. People are also worried about the enormous burden that rising health care costs are placing on American businesses, which are being forced to put off pay increases and lay off workers to cope with rising insurance premiums. And now people are concerned that a new government health plan that’s being talked about will make all of these problems even worse.

“For weeks, many of us have been warning about plans for a government takeover of health care along the lines of the takeovers we’ve seen in other areas of the private sector. Now the details of those plans are coming to light, and they raise two questions: How much is all this going to cost, and how are we going to pay for it?

“Let’s take just three proposals in the plan that’s currently taking shape over in the Health Education Labor and Pensions Committee, the details of which are just beginning to emerge.

“First, there’s a massive expansion of Medicaid. Here’s a program that was originally established as a partnership between the federal government and the states to assist the poor and disabled and which has become fiscally unsustainable. Yet rather than reform this broken program, the HELP Committee is proposing a massive new expansion instead.

“Second, the HELP Committee bill includes massive new subsidies for Americans with incomes higher than $100,000. The purpose of these subsidies is to help defray the cost of rising insurance premiums. Well, we all know that health insurance is too expensive. But we ought to be working to lower those premiums, not opening up the federal checkbook to drive them up even higher.

“Third, the HELP Committee bill establishes a new so-called Prevention and Public Health Investment Fund. The details of this fund are a little murky, but early indications are that it will direct billions of dollars to things like having the government build sidewalks and government-subsidized farmers markets.

“The idea here is to use tax dollars to encourage healthier lifestyles. But at a time when Americans are buried under medical bills and frightened about losing the coverage they have, farmers markets and sidewalks aren’t the reforms they have in mind.

“Americans want serious health care reform — not expansions of programs that are already fiscally unsustainable; subsidies that disguise rising costs instead of addressing their causes; and billions for sidewalks and asparagus. These are precisely the kinds of proposals that mask the underlying problems and cause people to lose faith in government solutions. And they’re not acceptable.

“The details we’re seeing from the HELP Committee should make us more skeptical of a government health plan — not less. And they should underscore for every American the need for the kind of real, comprehensive reforms some of us have been calling for over the past few weeks.

“The irony in this whole debate is that we’re being told America’s fiscal future will be jeopardized if we don’t allow the same people who are proposing these outrageous so-called ‘reforms’ to take over the entire health care system.

“Preliminary estimates for this flawed legislative proposal are staggering. Just yesterday, the Congressional Budget Office released an estimate of just part of the HELP Committee bill. Focusing on just this one section, the CBO determined the bill will spend $1.3 trillion over 10 years, even though 37 million people would still be left without health insurance.

“And this isn’t even a complete evaluation of the bill. Large proposals that will have a significant impact on the cost such as a Medicaid expansion and a government run plan have not even been factored in. Moreover, according to the details of this HELP Committee plan, a newly-created health care exchange would result in 15 million Americans losing the employer coverage they currently have — further evidence that if you like what you have, you may well lose it under a government-run plan.

“How does the HELP Committee propose we pay for all this?

“Well, its proposal is full of creative new ways to spend taxpayer dollars, but it offers little in the way of offsetting the cost of the overall bill. They will either charge the money to the national credit card or, more likely, raise taxes on working families. In other words, more spending, higher taxes, and even more debt. So far, some of the taxes under discussion include a new tax on soda, juice boxes, the creation of a new tax on jobs, and new limits on charitable deductions.

“Based on the CBO estimate, these taxes would be just the beginning. The health care proposal being put together is not only extremely defective, it will cost a fortune. And that cost will come straight out of the taxpayer’s pocketbook.

“The bottom line is this: Under the illusion of reform, Americans will be asked to give up the care they like for something worse, and then they’ll be taxed to the hilt to pay for it. Americans don’t want changes that make the entire health care system as unsustainable as Medicaid — and they don’t want to go broke covering the cost.”

###