Recent Press Releases

Judge Gorsuch Awarded Highest ABA Rating Possible

That’s high acclaim from an organization that our colleagues on the Left have long considered the “gold standard.”

March 13, 2017

WASHINGTON, D.C.U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) made the following remarks on the Senate floor today regarding the Judge Neil Gorsuch and the “Well Qualified” rating he has been awarded by American Bar Association:

“The endorsements for Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch keep rolling in from across the political spectrum. As I noted last Thursday, more than 150 former Columbia University classmates joined that extensive list recently. Those classmates represented a variety of backgrounds, home states, faiths, and political views. But they all agreed on one thing: that Judge Gorsuch is extremely well qualified to be our next Supreme Court Justice.

“On Thursday, I also noted that we could expect more supporters with sterling reviews of the judge in the near future. Sure enough, that very evening the American Bar Association awarded Judge Gorsuch its highest possible rating: unanimously ‘Well Qualified.’

“The Democratic Leader and the former Democratic Chairman of the Judiciary Committee have called the ABA ‘the gold standard by which judicial candidates are judged.’ And today, it’s a group that believes Judge Gorsuch is ‘Well Qualified’ to be a Supreme Court Justice ‘based on [his] integrity, professional competence and judicial temperament…’

“That’s high acclaim from an organization that our colleagues on the Left have long considered the ‘gold standard.’ It’s the type of acclaim we keep hearing from Democrats and Republicans in the legal community.

“Judge Gorsuch has an impressive resume and impressive credentials to match. He graduated Phi Beta Kappa from Columbia in just three years, got his law degree from Harvard, and he’s an Oxford scholar to boot. The Senate confirmed him to his current position on the circuit court without a single vote in opposition.

“He’s the right jurist for the job. As we move forward with his nomination later this month, we should give him the fair consideration, debate, and up-or-down vote that he deserves, just like we did with the four Supreme Court nominees of Presidents Clinton and Obama after they were first elected.”

Senate Overturns Obama-era Education Regulation that Undermined Local Control of Schools

Sends to president’s desk resolution affirming that Congress writes the laws—not the Department of Education

March 9, 2017

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Senate today voted for local school boards over a National School Board and affirmed that Congress writes the law, not the Department of Education. The Senate sent to President Trump’s desk a resolution to rescind the department’s final regulation for implementing the accountability provisions of the Every Student Succeeds Act.

The resolution that now heads to the president’s desk was led by Senate education committee Chairman Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) and nine Republican senators.

Senator Alexander (R-Tenn.) said: “The issue before us was whether the United States Congress writes the laws or whether the Department of Education writes the laws. Under Article I of our Constitution, the United States Congress writes the law, and in at least seven cases this Education Department regulation directly violated the Every Student Succeeds Act law passed just 15 months ago. And in at least 16 other cases, the regulation did something that the Congress did not authorize it to do.”

He continued, “And this resolution is also on a subject that’s very important to this Congress – whether there should be a national school board or a local school board. That decision was made in 2015 when 85 senators voted for the bill to fix No Child Left Behind that the Wall Street Journal said was ‘the largest devolution of federal control to the states in a quarter-century.’ Congress reversed the trend toward a national school board and restored control of classrooms to states, teachers, and parents. So, today’s vote is a victory for everyone who was fed up with Washington telling them so much about what to do about their children in 100,000 public schools, and I look forward to President Trump’s signature of this resolution.”

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said: “As a co-sponsor of this measure, I am proud the Senate voted to end an Obama-era regulation that was simply unacceptable for America’s students and educators. States are supposed to be the leaders on core curriculum and decisions on how to best meet the needs of their students — not Washington bureaucrats. The repeal of this regulation will help restore that process. Thanks to the Congressional Review Act, we capitalized on the opportunity to move past this overreaching regulation to ensure the ideals of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) are upheld, and I commend Senator Alexander for his leadership on this issue.”

Senator Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) said: “I’m glad to see Congress push back against this federal overreach. Now states and local communities can decide how best to educate their children.”

Senator Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) said: “Last Congress, members from both sides of the aisle came together to pass a new education law that overhauled No Child Left Behind and brought control of our children’s education back where it belonged, with states and parents. But this regulation from the Department of Education flies in the face of those changes, clearly violating the law. I am glad that Congress took action to stop this regulation in its tracks, because it is states, not the federal government, that should be in charge of school accountability.”

Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.): “A major highlight of the bipartisan ESSA bill returned power over education decisions back to where it belongs – schools, teachers and parents. The Obama administration’s accountability regulation undermined this important law by enabling federal bureaucrats to once again tie the hands of states with mandated education policies. I’m glad the Senate acted today to eliminate this burdensome regulation, uphold the intent of the law, and ensure that states and parents in Arizona and around the country have the final say on what is best for their children’s’ future.”

Senator David Perdue (R-Ga.): “In the past year, we have made significant progress in reducing Washington’s control of our schools and this regulation undermines this effort. One-size-fits-all education standards have failed our students and what we are seeing here is a bureaucratic attempt to retain control over accountability standards. We are acting immediately to stop this regulation and ensure accountability standards remain under the purview of states and not with the federal government.”

Senator Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) said: "I have made it clear that our children receive the best possible education when decisions are made at the local and state level. ESSA was written to restore responsibility to states for their local schools by providing increased flexibility to design and implement their education programs. Unfortunately, the Obama Administration blatantly ignored both the spirit and intent of ESSA when drafting the accountability regulation. I’m pleased the Senate has passed this resolution to ensure that these key education decisions are made by states instead of the federal government.”

Senator Roger Wicker (R-Miss.): “By cutting this red tape, we would remove Washington bureaucrats from the classroom and empower states, local education agencies, teachers, and parents to make the best decisions for students, both in Mississippi and across the country. I applaud my colleagues who join me in working to reverse this regulation.”

Original cosponsors of the Congressional Review Act resolution led by Chairman Alexander (R-Tenn.) and passed by the Senate today are Majority Leader McConnell (R-Ky.) and Senators Cassidy (R-La.), Cornyn (R-Texas), Cotton (R-Ark.), Enzi (R-Wyo.), McCain (R-Ariz.), Perdue (R-Ga.), Roberts (R-Kan.), and Wicker (R-Miss.).

WASHINGTON, D.C.U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) made the following remarks on the Senate floor today regarding Supreme Court nominee, Judge Neil Gorsuch:

“Since his nomination to the Supreme Court was announced, Judge Neil Gorsuch has received extensive praise from former colleagues, the legal community, and editorial boards, among many others. It’s praise that’s come from across the political spectrum too. Even many on the Left can’t help but compliment Judge Gorsuch’s credentials, including former President Obama’s own legal mentor who called him ‘brilliant’ and his former acting solicitor general who applauded Gorsuch’s ‘fairness and decency.’

“This week we add to that lengthy list of supporters with more than 150 of Judge Gorsuch’s former classmates at Columbia University. As they note, these alumni have followed an array of post-graduate pursuits: they are CEOs and stay at home parents, professors and lawyers, entrepreneurs and scientists. They come from different socio-economic and ethnic backgrounds, practice different faiths, reside in different parts of the country, and hold diverse political views.

“Even so, each of these Columbia grads can agree on at least one thing: Neil Gorsuch’s fitness to serve on the Supreme Court. Let me share with you from the letter they just sent to the Judiciary Committee.

“‘At Columbia, Neil Gorsuch notably distinguished himself among his peers. He was a serious and brilliant student who earned deep respect from teachers and students alike. With an encyclopedic knowledge on a staggering array of subjects, he could be counted on for his insightful, logical and well-reasoned comments. He carried a full and challenging course-load, finishing in three years and graduating Phi Beta Kappa.’

“The letter continues:

“‘The hallmark of Neil Gorsuch’s tenure at Columbia was his unflagging commitment to respectful and open dialogue on campus.’

“‘Despite an often contentious environment, Neil was a steadfast believer that we could disagree without being disagreeable. To be sure, he could deliver a devastating argument, laden with carefully researched facts and presented in a crisp and organized manner. Yet he was always a thoughtful and fair-minded listener who would not hesitate to re-evaluate his own beliefs when presented with persuasive arguments. His amiable nature, good humor and respect for differing viewpoints was admired and appreciated by all.’

“It was clear even years ago, they say, that the ‘intellect, academic record, and character’ of their classmate Neil Gorsuch was, quote, ‘so special’ that ‘there was a shared sense that he was poised for a meaningful and purposeful future.’ How right they were.

“Judge Neil Gorsuch is exceptionally qualified to serve on the Supreme Court. He has, as I just noted, an ‘encyclopedic knowledge on a staggering array of subjects … with insightful, logical and well-reasoned comments.’ He’s a ‘humble man with no appetite for self-promotion.’ And he’s ‘an upstanding person’ with ‘unyielding integrity, faith in our institutions and unfailing politeness. Those are the words of his former classmates, and they are the qualities that we expect in a Supreme Court Justice.

“Regardless of political leanings, we all should understand the importance of confirming justices who will interpret the law as written, not misuse their office to impose their own views as to what, in their mind, should have been written instead. We should understand the importance of confirming justices who will apply the law equally to all Americans, not rule based on their empathy for certain groups over others.

“I am confident that Judge Gorsuch is more than prepared to meet these critical standards. It’s the type of judge he’s been on the federal court of appeals. It’s the type of justice he will be in on the high court too. That’s why we continue to see recommendations for Gorsuch flooding in from people of all backgrounds and all political views.

“In the coming weeks, I’m sure the support for Judge Gorsuch will continue to grow. And I know we’re all eager to hear from the Judge himself when he goes before the Judiciary Committee later this month. When he does, I hope colleagues on both sides will show him the fair consideration he deserves — the same fair consideration we showed to all four of the Supreme Court nominees of Presidents Obama and Clinton after they were first elected — a respectful hearing followed by an up-or-down vote.”