Recent Press Releases



‘A narrow majority in Washington has passed a budget that provides for the largest tax hike in U.S. history and sets a new spending record – and supporters of this budget should not be proud of either’



Washington, D.C.—U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell released the following statement Wednesday regarding the Democrats’ budget:



“At a time when American families are tightening their belts, Washington should be doing the same. Yet this budget would take more money – an average of $2,300 – out of the paychecks of middle class families to pay for over $1 trillion in non-emergency spending. With rising gas prices and economic concerns, Congress needs to lower taxes on working Americans and job creators and rein in wasteful Washington spending. Instead, a narrow majority in Washington has passed a budget that provides for the largest tax hike in U.S. history and sets a new spending record – and supporters of this budget should not be proud of either.”



###



‘While fanatical states like Iran may still exist, past success gives us reason to hope for a day when all Arab states will realize that Israel isn’t going anywhere, that anti-Israeli rhetoric will not solve its domestic problems, and that making peace with the Jewish state is in the best interests of its own people’



Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell delivered remarks on Tuesday at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) Annual Policy Conference:



“It’s always a pleasure to be with AIPAC. It is, of course, a special honor this year, as we mark the 60th anniversary of the modern state of Israel. As any parent or teacher will attest, you usually get more of what you celebrate. It’s my hope that as a result of this year’s celebrations, we will see even greater things from this nation of miracles in the years to come.



“I see a lot of familiar faces, and many old friends. There is one old friend, I’m sad to say, who is not with us this year, and that’s Bubba Mitchell. Bubba meant a lot to AIPAC, and he meant a lot to me and Elaine. In nearly a quarter century of friendship, he and I saw eye to eye on just about everything — except, of course, who should come out on top in a matchup between the Louisville Cardinals and the Alabama Crimson Tide.



“Louisville and Alabama actually played once, in the 1991 Fiesta Bowl, and Bubba and I were there. Louisville, of course, won the game, and, as you can imagine, I made sure never to mention that game ever again. And I certainly never reminded Bubba of the score. Thirty-Four to Seven.



“Bubba and I shared a deep love of college football and a passion for public service. We were frequent traveling companions, and Elaine and I were frequent guests at the Mitchell home in Mobile. Bubba and I were also both born in Alabama, though I was born so far north, in Sheffield, that he practically considered me a Yankee. He was a good friend and a great man, and he supported many worthy causes in a full and rewarding life. But, above all, Bubba valued his family. Arlene and Abe Mitchell are with us today. They’re carrying on the Mitchell tradition. And I want to thank them. It’s a fitting tribute to Bubba’s efforts on behalf of Israel and America that AIPAC’s new home now bears his name.



“Israel has always been an important part of my work. One of the first international trips I ever took was a trip to Israel in the late ‘70s. And I’ve been back many times since, through my years as chairman and ranking member on the Senate Foreign Operations Appropriations Subcommittee.



“During my time on the Subcommittee, I sponsored several pieces of major legislation in support of Israel, including the Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act of 2006, which restricts aid to the Palestinian Authority unless and until it acknowledges Israel’s right to exist, commits itself to prior agreements, institutes financial transparency, and begins to dismantle its terrorist infrastructure. More recently, I cosponsored a bill that would impose sanctions on Iran and on any nation that supports its nuclear program. And looking ahead, the singular challenge posed by the Iranian regime all-but guarantees that future Congresses will have an opportunity to even further strengthen American-Israeli ties.



“Anniversaries are a good time to look back. And as we reflect on the close relationship that Israel and the U.S. have enjoyed over the years, the first thing to note is that it wasn’t inevitable. The greatest initial resistance didn’t come from any segment of the electorate, but from the U.S. State Department. Fortunately for Israel, President Truman had the foresight and wisdom, in the end, not to go along with his advisors at State. He’d been convinced, in private conversations with Chaim Weizmann, among others, that the choice for the Jews was a choice between statehood and extermination. And, as Truman later wrote, he was not going to let the “striped pants conspirators” at the State Department interfere with his plans. I note for the record that America’s 33rd president had a rather colorful way of speaking.



“Truman never regretted his decision, and he was deeply moved by the gratitude of the Jewish people. This was vividly illustrated by a meeting Truman had with the chief Rabbi of Israel. Here’s how Truman advisor David K. Niles remembered the event. He wrote:



'When the Chief Rabbi of Israel, Isaac Helevi Herzog, called at the White House, he told Truman, 'God put you in your mother's womb so you would be the instrument to bring the rebirth of Israel after two thousand years.’ I thought he was overdoing things. But when I looked over at the President, tears were running down his cheeks.'



“Truman’s reaction to Rabbi Herzog is a powerful reminder that the bond between Israel and the U.S. has always extended far beyond sober strategic interests.



“As many have noted before, both nations were born in conflict. Both were built up through the hard work and the pioneering spirit of people who had come from many nations. And both have relied, in all this, on a foundational respect for all the elements of a free society: rule of law, free press, freedom of religion, and deep respect for individual rights and human dignity.



“Indeed, America’s kinship with the Jewish people is as old as America itself. Our first president saw that this land would always be a home away from home for Jews who came here after centuries of fearful isolation. And in a letter to the Jewish Congregation of Newport, he even prayed for it. In the years that followed, America’s Jewish immigrants would join millions of others from nations around the world in building up America’s political, cultural, artistic, economic, civic and religious life.



“America’s Jewish immigrants would fight and die beside their countrymen in two World Wars. They would share the same hopes and fears that all Americans did. And when the time came for them to establish a homeland of their own, it was only natural that most Americans would support it.



“This is amply confirmed by the historical record. As early as 1922, Congress had affirmed the central principle of the Balfour Declaration. By 1945, 33 states, representing 85 percent of the U.S. population, had passed resolutions favoring a Jewish State. And two years before Truman officially recognized Israel, the State Department conducted a poll that showed strong support for a Jewish state by a vast majority of Americans. When David Ben-Gurion declared a new Jewish state at Midnight, Tel Aviv time, on May 14, 1948, one thing was clear: most Americans were very happy about it.



“Over the years, that bond has grown stronger, thanks, in large part, to the extraordinary bipartisan support that Israel has traditionally enjoyed in Washington. In a town where the two parties seldom agree on much, Israel has always been a notable exception. Beyond our shared values, Americans of all political stripes respect and admire Israel’s astonishing achievement in subduing its desert home and in preserving freedom and democratic values in the face of constant security threats.



“Still, it was not until fairly recently that any of us fully appreciated all that Israel’s achievement involved, particularly in the area of security. America and Israel have always been closely united in our desire for peace, and in a shared belief that the foundation of peace is strength. But it wasn’t until terrorists brought their murderous ideology to American shores that Americans saw, as the Israelis always had, that freedom’s defense would have to be a constant, often painful, fight.



“Israel has lived with mortal threats from day one. And it has earned America’s respect by its firmness and resolve in beating its enemies back. But Al Qaeda forced America to look even more closely at Israel’s daily experience with this fight, and to draw important lessons from it.



“Chief among them was the necessity of vigilance and the realization that the terrorist threat would be an enduring one. Israel’s success over the years isn’t the result of good luck. Every success was built on a solid foundation of expert training, exceptional tools, a commanding knowledge of the enemy, and an unshakeable commitment to never rest. Indeed, one could say that the only thing Israel ever achieved without a prior demonstration of strength was statehood itself, an act that one former Israeli leader described as ‘the last instance in diplomatic history of persuasion without power.’



“This new level of vigilance was and remains a difficult lesson for Americans to learn. Historically, we as a nation have always tended to resist foreign entanglements, to use Washington’s word. Or, failing that, we’ve tended to withdraw once conflicts have been resolved. If America stepped into a fight, it was usually because we’d been dragged into it. The result was that as a young nation, America’s foreign policy leaders saw the balance of power as something that other countries — the corrupt ones, the monarchies — worried about, but not us.



“Yet as our nation grew in size and strength, old notions passed away. After the First World War, we saw the price of isolation in the rise of totalitarian regimes from one end of the world to the other. It was only by a miracle of will and sacrifice that America built up a military force that could defeat the totalitarian threat.



“After World War II, America no longer had a choice. Faced with a nuclear threat too immediate and too powerful to ignore, we developed the policies and strategies intended to preserve the balance of power between NATO and the Warsaw Pact, and we lived with the epic faceoff of Mutually Assured Destruction. If you destroy us, we destroy you — a frightening concept but, in some ways, a manageable one.



“The end of the Cold War brought an end to this strategy of containment, and our nation was slow to identify the immediate threats to our national security interests. All that changed on 9/11. On that day America learned, as Israel had learned long before, that a critical threat to security in our own time is not only nation states but threats from non-state actors employing asymmetrical warfare.



“From long, painful experience, Israel knew that international terror networks, operating across borders, independent of nation states, though sometimes supported by them, unafraid of death, could not be deterred the way nation-states could.



“After 9/11, America put that lesson into action by going on offense. We sought to deny the Taliban and Al Qaeda safe havens in Afghanistan. In Iraq, our fighting forces have achieved a stunning achievement in bringing Sunni tribal leaders together to deny Al Qaeda in Iraq sanctuary. We decided not to ignore the terrorists in the hopes that they would go away, but to defeat them on their own turf before they came to ours. And we have had success. Through an increased focus on intelligence, special operations, and homeland defense, many brave Americans have helped make sure that there hasn’t been a single attack on U.S. soil since 9/11.



“This shared commitment between the U.S. and Israel to a tough, permanent fight against terror is not limited to the shadows. It also involves the states that support terror, including Iran. In recent testimony on Capitol Hill, General David Petraeus said without equivocation that Iran is now the greatest obstacle to stability in Iraq through its Special Groups. Iran backs Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad recently invited camera crews on a tour of his uranium enrichment facility in Natanz, openly flouting the U.N. Security Council.



“Iran has violated no fewer than three binding Security Council resolutions, and, according to the IAEA, has likely drawn upon its military to support clandestine aspects of its nuclear program. This conclusion contrasts sharply with the most recent National Intelligence Estimate on Iran, which concluded that at a single point in time, Iran had put an end to its nuclear weapons program.



“Some people like to think that Iran is not a serious threat. They wave away the very suggestion of it as a kind of hysteria. Yet when a country completely ignores the U.N. Security Council; funds, arms, and trains terrorists; claims to pursue nuclear technology for civilian use, despite the fact that it sits atop the third largest oil reserves on the planet; and openly says it wants one of its neighbors wiped off the map, it is nothing if not a serious threat. This isn’t saber-rattling. It’s common sense. And those who disagree with it, in my view, don’t have any.



“Dealing with the Iranian threat will not be easy. Yet one thing is clear: the old tools of diplomacy are not sufficient in dealing with a nation like this. If Iran wants to be treated like a nation-state, it needs to act like one, by cutting its ties to murderous non-state actors.



“Until then, the U.S. and Israel must work together to contain the threat. And our combined efforts to meet it will not only reflect the enduring relationship our two nations have historically enjoyed, but also build a foundation for an even closer relationship, based on mutual safety and security, for the future.



“Israel’s wisdom in relying on vigilance and strength as a basis for relations with its neighbors is shown in the grudging respect that many of these nations have been forced to pay it. Over the years, Israel has been invaded repeatedly by its neighbors. In every case, it has turned them back. Over time, many of these former enemies, such as Egypt, Jordan, and Qatar, have become Israel’s diplomatic partners. And as long as Israel continues to remain firm with its enemies, there is reason to hope that others will as well.



“While fanatical states like Iran may still exist, past success gives us reason to hope for a day when all Arab states will realize that Israel isn’t going anywhere, that anti-Israeli rhetoric will not solve its domestic problems, and that making peace with the Jewish state is in the best interests of its own people.



“For most of the last six decades, AIPAC has kept policymakers in Washington well informed about the concerns of the Israeli people and reminded Americans that the freedoms we’ve enjoyed in our own country are far more fragile than they seem, and worth defending.



“The first time I spoke to AIPAC we were celebrating Israel’s 40th birthday. Twenty years later, I am deeply grateful for the opportunity to share in the celebration of another. David Ben-Gurion said, ‘In Israel, in order to be a realist you must believe in miracles.’ On this 60th Anniversary, I commend Israel on the great miracle of its rebirth and extend all my best wishes for its future success and prosperity, always, as ever, in solidarity with a strong and prosperous United States.”



###



McConnell on the Boxer Climate Tax

‘At a time when Americans are struggling to pay their bills and when the price of gas seems to be rising higher and higher every day, the Democrat leadership is showing itself to be laughably out of touch by moving to a bill that would raise the price of gas even higher…There is a better way to move forward. Climate change is a serious issue, and we should continue taking action to address it’



WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell delivered the following remarks on the Senate floor Monday regarding the enormous costs to the economy that would result from the Boxer Climate Tax bill:



“Having spent most of the past week in Kentucky, I can say with a pretty high level of confidence that the single most important issue to the people of my state is the fact that they’re paying about twice as much for a gallon of gasoline than they were last year.



“I’m also fairly confident that Kentuckians aren’t alone in their frustration. Gas prices are, without doubt, the single most pressing issue for Americans at the moment.



“And that’s why it’s so hard to comprehend the Majority’s decision to move to a bill, at the start of the summer driving season, that would raise the price of gas by as much as $1.40 a gallon, home electricity bills by about 44 percent, and natural gas prices by about 20 percent.



“Now, of all times, is not the time to be increasing the burden on American consumers. Now is the time to be considering overdue legislation that would send gas prices down, not up.



“Now is the time to be considering, and approving, legislation that would allow Americans to increase energy production within our own borders, and to accelerate the process of moving to clean nuclear energy. Now is the time to do something about $4.00 a gallon gasoline, not something that would give us $6.00 a gallon gas down the road.



“So the timing of this bill could not be worse. And the substance is just as bad.

“Let’s be clear on something at the outset of this debate: The Senate supports reducing carbon emissions. Just last year, we took serious, bipartisan steps to increase fuel economy standards for cars and trucks, increase the use of renewable fuels, and expand research into advanced technologies to reduce pollution and stress on the environment.



“But in everything we’ve done, we’ve kept a couple of non-negotiable principles in mind: First, any legislation that reduces carbon emissions can’t kill U.S. jobs. And second, any legislation in this area must promote innovation here at home.



“This legislation fails both tests miserably. If passed, it would have a devastating impact on the U.S. economy. It is, at its heart, a stealth and giant tax on virtually every aspect of industrial and consumer life. It would result in massive job losses. And it seeks to radically alter consumer behavior, without any measurable benefit to the environment in return.



“Overall, it’s expected to result in GDP losses totaling as much as $2.9 trillion by 2050.



“If our economy were running on all cylinders, this bill would be terrible economically. At a time when the economy is struggling, when the price of gas, food, and power bills, are skyrocketing, this giant tax would be an unbearable new burden for Americans to bear.



“The Senate has already expressed its willingness to cut carbon emissions. This Congress has acted in a bipartisan way to reduce greenhouse gases by tightening automobile fuel economy standards, and by requiring increased use of alternative fuels in last year’s energy bill. But moving forward, we should agree, with gas prices as high as they are, that any further action in this area must protect American consumers and American jobs.



“This means investing in new, clean energy technologies, including clean coal technologies which can capture and store carbon emissions. This means encouraging the construction of new, zero-emission nuclear power plants, and ensuring continued domestic sources of enriched uranium. And it means developing countries must also participate — countries like India and China, which already exceeds the U.S. in greenhouse gas emissions.



“Legislation that fails to address clean coal technologies would have a disproportionately negative economic effect on states like Kentucky that rely on coal-fired power plants. According to one study, this bill would eliminate nearly 55,000 jobs in Kentucky alone, and cost the average Kentucky household more than $6,000 a year.



“This is an unthinkable economic burden to lay on the citizens of my state, especially when developing nations like India and China wouldn’t be held to the same standards. The impact of this climate tax is too great to bear, for Kentuckians and the rest of the country.



“At a time when Americans are struggling to pay their bills and when the price of gas seems to be rising higher and higher every day, the Democrat leadership is showing itself to be laughably out of touch by moving to a bill that would raise the price of gas even higher.



“This proposed climate tax legislation would be a bad idea even if its impact were beyond dispute. The fact that experts tell us its actual impact on reducing global temperatures is hardly measurable — and will be negligible if China and India do not approve similar measures — makes the wisdom of moving to it at this time even more questionable.



“Why would we raise the price of gas, the cost of electricity, the cost of food, and put the brakes on our economy – when it will all be for nothing if China and India aren’t willing to do the same?



“And who exactly expects these developing nations to take similar action to slow their economic growth and raise prices for their consumers? No one. No one seriously expects that they will approve anything similar to this legislation.



“Which means that for American consumers, the Boxer bill is all cost and no benefit.



“There is a better way to move forward. Climate change is a serious issue, and we should continue taking action to address it, as we did in last year’s energy bill.



“But the way to proceed is to invest in clean energy technologies that allow us to reduce greenhouse gas emissions without harming our economy, sending jobs overseas, and raising energy prices across the board for U.S. workers, families, farmers, and truckers.



“Republicans are eager to begin this debate, and we will have amendments that protect consumers from the price increases and job losses in the Boxer Substitute.



“Some of the problems with this bill have been explored in a number of excellent articles over the past few days. I note, in particular, an article by George Will entitled, ‘Carbon’s Power Brokers’; an article by Charles Krauthammer entitled, ‘Carbon Chastity’; an editorial in today’s Wall Street Journal entitled ‘Cap and Spend’; and an article in today’s New York Post by Jerry Taylor entitled ‘Solving Pump Pain.’ I ask that all four be submitted in the record.



“It’s my expectation that once we get on the bill, the Majority will allow for amendments, and for what I expect will be a rather robust debate on the merits of this climate tax legislation.”