‘So what’s becoming abundantly clear is that the Majority will make any deal, agree to any terms, sign any dotted line that brings them closer to final passage of this terrible bill. They are, for lack of a better term, winging it on one of the most consequential pieces of domestic legislation in memory’
WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor Tuesday regarding the importance of getting it right on health care reform:
“Over the past several days, Americans have seen in vivid detail what supporters of this bill plan to do to the Medicare health care program for seniors. They plan to use it as a giant piggy bank to pay for an entirely new government program. And yesterday we heard floated, for the very first time, that they want to radically expand Medicare.
“So what’s becoming abundantly clear is that the Majority will make any deal, agree to any terms, sign any dotted line that brings them closer to final passage of this terrible bill.
“They entertain adding new experiments without any assessment of the impact this backroom deal making will have on the American people or our economy. They are, for lack of a better term, winging it on one of the most consequential pieces of domestic legislation in memory.
“Well, let me suggest to the Majority, Americans would much rather we get it right than scurry around throwing together untested, last-minute experiments in order to get 60 votes by Christmas.
“Over the past several days, our friends on the other side repeatedly voted to preserve nearly half a trillion dollars in Medicare cuts to finance their vision of reform — a vision that includes cutting nearly $8 billion from hospice care … $40 billion in cuts to home health agencies … $120 billion in cuts to Medicare Advantage … $135 billion in cuts to hospitals that serve Medicare patients … and nearly $15 billion in cuts to nursing homes.
“What these cuts really illustrate is a lack of vision. Because cutting one troubled government program in order to create another is a mistake. I’ll say it again: half a trillion dollars in cuts to Medicare for seniors is not reform.
“But Medicare cuts are just one leg of the stool holding up this misguided vision of reform. Let’s take a look at another; let’s look at how this bill punishes not only seniors, but how it kills jobs at a time when one in ten working Americans is looking for one. This bill doesn’t just punish seniors, it punishes job creators too.
“That’s the message we got yesterday from small businesses across the country. They sent us a letter opposing this bill because it doesn’t do the things proponents of this bill promised it would. It doesn’t lower costs. It doesn’t help create jobs, and it doesn’t help the economy.
“Here are just some of the groups that signed this letter:
• Associated Builders and Contractors
• Associated General Contractors
• International Foodservice Distributors Association
• National Association of Manufacturers
• National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors
• National Retail Federation
• Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council
• U.S. Chamber of Commerce
“And here’s what these groups had to say about this bill. I’m reading now from their letter, dated December 7, 2009, a letter that was addressed to every member of the Senate:
‘In order to finance part of its $2.5 trillion price tag, HR 3590 imposes new taxes, fees and penalties totaling nearly half a trillion dollars. This financial burden falls disproportionately on the backs of small business. Small firms are in desperate need of this precious capital for job creation, investment, business expansion and survival.’
“The letter goes on to detail all the ways in which this bill punishes small businesses — thus making it harder for them to retain or hire workers.
“These groups point out that:
• Under this bill, small businesses in the U.S. would see major cost increases as a result of new taxes on health benefits and health insurance — costs that will be passed onto employees and which would make health insurance more expensive, not less.
• Under this bill, self-employed business owners who buy coverage for themselves could see a double-digit jump in their insurance premiums
• For other small businesses, the bill won’t lead to a significant decrease in costs — something they were promised as a result of this bill
• Under this bill, jobs would be lost and wages depressed as a result of a new law that would require businesses either to buy insurance for their employees or pay a fine
“Needless to say, this is not the kind of legislation the American worker needs or wants at a moment of double digit unemployment. And perhaps that’s the reason that poll after poll after public opinion poll shows that the American worker opposes this bill.
“Some business groups may have supported this plan earlier in the year because they thought it was inevitable. They didn’t want to be critical of a bill they thought they had no power to stop. But something happened between then and now. The American people realized what this bill meant for them. They realized what it would mean for seniors, for business owners, for the economy, for our future as a country.
“Americans stood up. They made their voices heard. And now the tide has turned. The American people oppose this bill. They want us to start over. They want us to make common sense, step by step reforms that everyone can support — not some backroom deal to have the government take over the health care system that’s then forced on the American people without discussion.
“Our friends on the other side can read the writing on the wall. They know Americans oppose this bill. But they’ve apparently made a calculation to force it through Congress over the next several days before the American people even have a chance to absorb the details.
“The only thing that can stop them is the realization by Democrats themselves that this plan would be a tragic mistake for seniors, for the economy, and for our country — and that a better path would be the kind of step-by-step reforms that Americans have been asking us for; reforms Americans really want. Americans don’t think reform should come at the expense of seniors. And they don’t think it should come at the expense of jobs. They don’t think it should make current problems worse.”
###
WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor Tuesday regarding the importance of getting it right on health care reform:
“Over the past several days, Americans have seen in vivid detail what supporters of this bill plan to do to the Medicare health care program for seniors. They plan to use it as a giant piggy bank to pay for an entirely new government program. And yesterday we heard floated, for the very first time, that they want to radically expand Medicare.
“So what’s becoming abundantly clear is that the Majority will make any deal, agree to any terms, sign any dotted line that brings them closer to final passage of this terrible bill.
“They entertain adding new experiments without any assessment of the impact this backroom deal making will have on the American people or our economy. They are, for lack of a better term, winging it on one of the most consequential pieces of domestic legislation in memory.
“Well, let me suggest to the Majority, Americans would much rather we get it right than scurry around throwing together untested, last-minute experiments in order to get 60 votes by Christmas.
“Over the past several days, our friends on the other side repeatedly voted to preserve nearly half a trillion dollars in Medicare cuts to finance their vision of reform — a vision that includes cutting nearly $8 billion from hospice care … $40 billion in cuts to home health agencies … $120 billion in cuts to Medicare Advantage … $135 billion in cuts to hospitals that serve Medicare patients … and nearly $15 billion in cuts to nursing homes.
“What these cuts really illustrate is a lack of vision. Because cutting one troubled government program in order to create another is a mistake. I’ll say it again: half a trillion dollars in cuts to Medicare for seniors is not reform.
“But Medicare cuts are just one leg of the stool holding up this misguided vision of reform. Let’s take a look at another; let’s look at how this bill punishes not only seniors, but how it kills jobs at a time when one in ten working Americans is looking for one. This bill doesn’t just punish seniors, it punishes job creators too.
“That’s the message we got yesterday from small businesses across the country. They sent us a letter opposing this bill because it doesn’t do the things proponents of this bill promised it would. It doesn’t lower costs. It doesn’t help create jobs, and it doesn’t help the economy.
“Here are just some of the groups that signed this letter:
• Associated Builders and Contractors
• Associated General Contractors
• International Foodservice Distributors Association
• National Association of Manufacturers
• National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors
• National Retail Federation
• Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council
• U.S. Chamber of Commerce
“And here’s what these groups had to say about this bill. I’m reading now from their letter, dated December 7, 2009, a letter that was addressed to every member of the Senate:
‘In order to finance part of its $2.5 trillion price tag, HR 3590 imposes new taxes, fees and penalties totaling nearly half a trillion dollars. This financial burden falls disproportionately on the backs of small business. Small firms are in desperate need of this precious capital for job creation, investment, business expansion and survival.’
“The letter goes on to detail all the ways in which this bill punishes small businesses — thus making it harder for them to retain or hire workers.
“These groups point out that:
• Under this bill, small businesses in the U.S. would see major cost increases as a result of new taxes on health benefits and health insurance — costs that will be passed onto employees and which would make health insurance more expensive, not less.
• Under this bill, self-employed business owners who buy coverage for themselves could see a double-digit jump in their insurance premiums
• For other small businesses, the bill won’t lead to a significant decrease in costs — something they were promised as a result of this bill
• Under this bill, jobs would be lost and wages depressed as a result of a new law that would require businesses either to buy insurance for their employees or pay a fine
“Needless to say, this is not the kind of legislation the American worker needs or wants at a moment of double digit unemployment. And perhaps that’s the reason that poll after poll after public opinion poll shows that the American worker opposes this bill.
“Some business groups may have supported this plan earlier in the year because they thought it was inevitable. They didn’t want to be critical of a bill they thought they had no power to stop. But something happened between then and now. The American people realized what this bill meant for them. They realized what it would mean for seniors, for business owners, for the economy, for our future as a country.
“Americans stood up. They made their voices heard. And now the tide has turned. The American people oppose this bill. They want us to start over. They want us to make common sense, step by step reforms that everyone can support — not some backroom deal to have the government take over the health care system that’s then forced on the American people without discussion.
“Our friends on the other side can read the writing on the wall. They know Americans oppose this bill. But they’ve apparently made a calculation to force it through Congress over the next several days before the American people even have a chance to absorb the details.
“The only thing that can stop them is the realization by Democrats themselves that this plan would be a tragic mistake for seniors, for the economy, and for our country — and that a better path would be the kind of step-by-step reforms that Americans have been asking us for; reforms Americans really want. Americans don’t think reform should come at the expense of seniors. And they don’t think it should come at the expense of jobs. They don’t think it should make current problems worse.”
###
